Rubric

Find Rubric
Audio Project
Audio Project
Criteria Ratings Pts
Creativity/Intentionality
threshold: pts
5 pts
Creative and Intentional
Video demonstrates both creativity and intentionality in its making. This video includes a good idea, and each part of the video demonstrates thought and effort.
4 pts
Intentional
Video accomplishes the assigned task and demonstrates intentionality, but it does not demonstrate creativity and may have needed more time/effort to be its best.
3 pts
There was a thought.
The video accomplishes the basic mission of the project, but there is not evidence of thought or effort beyond that.
0 pts
No effort or intentionality present.
Video does not demonstrate time, intentionality, or effort.
pts
5 pts
--
Composition
threshold: pts
5 pts
Great Composition
Video shots exhibit great use of compositional techniques. Necessary changes are minimal, and the techniques used bring out emotion, purpose, and the best of the video.
4 pts
Moderate Composition
The video exhibits use of compositional techniques, but there may be changes or additional techniques necessary to clean up the composition.
3 pts
Only Basic Composition
The video uses some composition techniques, but they are almost all the same ones and only a simple selection of the most basic principles was chosen.
0 pts
Lack of Composition
The photo does not exhibit proper use of compositional techniques.
pts
5 pts
--
Editing
threshold: pts
5 pts
Seamless and Professional
The editing of this video adds to the overall video quality. This means that the video is not only lacking editing mistakes, but it also includes several well chosen editing techniques which bring out the video's best.
4 pts
Moderate Quality Editing
The editing flows smoothly on a regular basis. There is, however, more than a couple minor mistakes which pull away from the video's quality or are somewhat distracting. Overall, the editing is good but it does not add to the video's quality.
3 pts
Demonstrates Basic Editing
The video demonstrates basic editing, meaning that the video is complete and at least functions, but there may be large pieces of missing content, drastic mistakes, or the editing is distracting from the video.
0 pts
No quality editing present.
Editing lacks proper use of any techniques, and the editing job actually distracts from the video making it difficult to watch,
pts
5 pts
--
Lighting
threshold: pts
5 pts
Full Marks
Lighting is professional, accurate, and artistic. Almost nothing in the lighting is off and the look of the lighting adds a great deal to the video's mood/quality.
4 pts
Moderate Lighting Quality
Lighting is done generally well, meaning that it is even, intentional, generally boosts the quality of the video, and has a look that suits the video's story/mood. Though good, the lighting does not yet have an aspect of artistry or precision which makes the video stand out.
3 pts
Demonstrates Basic Lighting
Lighting principles were used, even if not well in all cases. At a minimum, the video is viewable and the lighting is only minorly distracting from the video in terms of its quality.
0 pts
Highly distracting lighting quality.
Either no lighting principles were used, or the lighting present is so distracting or poor that it is distracting from the rest of the video in a way that makes it difficult to watch.
0 pts
No Marks
pts
5 pts
--
Audio
threshold: pts
10 pts
Compelling Audio
Your audio includes high quality dialogue, some foley, appropriate background sounds, and music. Audio was edited to the required specs (-2 to -6db on average) and doesn't have any distracting noise or fuzz in the background. All together, the audio adds to the quality of your video.
8 pts
Good Audio - Minor Errors
Audio is good overall, meaning it is clear an understandable. However, either you did not incorporate all of the required sounds or specs, or there are some quality issues which are somewhat distracting to the quality of your video.
8 pts
Moderate Quality Audio
Audio is lacking quality and attention and is somewhat distracting to the quality of the video. Audio may not meet requirements, but it is at least still understandable.
0 pts
Poor Quality - Not Useable
Audio is either not understandable at all, or the viewer has to seriously strain themselves to hear what is being said. Either way, the audio seriously takes away from the quality of the video.
pts
10 pts
--