Rubric

Find Rubric
Rubric!
Rubric!
Criteria Ratings Pts
Focus
threshold: pts
4 pts
The response is fully sustained and consistently and purposefully focused: -Claim is clearly stated, focused, and strongly maintained -Opposing claims are clearly addressed -Claim is communicated clearly within the purpose, audience, and task
3 pts
The response is adequately sustained and generally focused: -Claim is clear and for the most part maintained, though some loosely related material may be present -Opposing claims are included, but may not be completely addressed -Context provided for the claim is adequate within the purpose, audience, and task
2 pts
The response is somewhat sustained and may have a minor drift in focus: -May be clearly focused on the claim, but is insufficiently sustained -Claim on the issue may be somewhat unclear and unfocused
1 pts
The response may be related to the topic, but may offer little relevant detail: -May be very brief -May have a major drift -Claim may be confusing or ambiguous
0 pts
Insufficient, illegible, foreign language, incoherent, off-topic, or off-purpose writing
pts
4 pts
--
Organization
threshold: pts
4 pts
The response has a clear and effective organizational structure, creating unity and completeness: -Effective, consistent use of a variety of transitional strategies to clarify the relationships between and among ideas -Logical progression of ideas from beginning to end -Effective introduction and conclusion for audience and purpose -Strong connections among ideas, with some syntactic variety
3 pts
The response has an evident organizational structure and a sense of completeness, though there may be minor flaws and some ideas may be loosely connected: -adequate use of transitional strategies with some variety to clarify the relationships between ideas -Adequate progression of ideas from beginning to end -Adequate introduction and conclusion -Adequate, if slightly inconsistent, connection among ideas.
2 pts
The response has an inconsistent organizational structure, and flaws are evident: -inconsistent use of basic transitional strategies with little variety -uneven progression of ideas from beginning to end -introduction and conclusion, if present, are weak -weak connection among ideas
1 pts
The response has little or no discernible organizational structure: -Few or no transitional strategies are evident -Frequently extraneous ideas may intrude
0 pts
Insufficient, illegible, foreign language, incoherent, off-topic, or off-purpose writing
pts
4 pts
--
Evidence
threshold: pts
4 pts
The response provides thorough and convincing evidence for the writer’s claim that includes the effective use of sources, facts, and details -use of evidence from sources is cited, smoothly integrated, comprehensive, relevant, and concrete.
3 pts
The response provides adequate evidence for the writer’s claim that includes the use of sources, facts, and details -Some evidence from sources is integrated, though citations may be general or imprecise.
2 pts
The response provides uneven, cursory evidence for the writer’s claim that includes partial or uneven use of sources, facts, and details -Evidence from sources is weakly integrated, and citations, if present, are uneven.
1 pts
The response provides minimal evidence for the writer’s claim that includes little or no use of sources, facts and details: -Use of evidence from sources is minimal, absent, in error, or irrelevant.
0 pts
Insufficient, illegible, foreign language, incoherent, off-topic, or off-purpose writing
pts
4 pts
--
Elaboration
threshold: pts
4 pts
The response achieves substantial depth that is specific and relevant, using a variety of elaborative techniques. The response clearly and effectively expresses ideas, using precise language. Use of academic and domain-specific vocabulary is clearly appropriate for the audience and purpose.
3 pts
The response achieves some depth and specificity, but is predominately general, using some elaborative techniques. The response adequately expresses ideas, employing a mix of precise with more general language. Use of domain-specific vocabulary is generally appropriate for the audience and purpose,
2 pts
The response achieves little depth, with weak or uneven use of elaborative techniques. The response expresses ideas unevenly, using simplistic language. Use of domain-specific vocabulary may at times be inappropriate for the audience and purpose.
1 pts
The response’s expression of ideas is vague, lacks clarity, or is confusing: -Uses limited language or domain-specific vocabulary -May have little sense of audience or purpose.
0 pts
Insufficient, illegible, foreign language, incoherent, off-topic, or off-purpose writing
pts
4 pts
--
Conventions
threshold: pts
4 pts
The response demonstrates an adequate command of conventions: -Some errors in usage and sentence formation may be present, but no systematic pattern of errors is displayed -Adequate use of punctuation, capitalization, and spelling.
2 pts
The response demonstrates a partial command of conventions: -Errors in usage may obscure meaning -Inconsistent use of punctuation, capitalization, and spelling.
0 pts
The response demonstrates a lack of command of conventions
pts
4 pts
--
Total Points: 20 out of 20